| |
|
Charismatic and
Pentecostal
IS SPEAKING IN TONGUES
AND
THE SIGN GIFTS VALID TODAY?
By Cooper Abrams
Table of
Contents
Introduction
What
Does the Bible Says About Tongues?
How
Does the Modern Gift of Tongues Compare to the Examples
in the Book of Acts?
The
Definition of the Word "Tongues."
The
New Testament Teaches that Gift of Tongues Would Cease (1
Cor. 13:8-10)
Conclusion:
Introduction
-
I will begin with a personal note. Some sincere
Christians, who love the Lord, believe that
speaking in tongues is a valid gift from God
today. There are others who misled by false
teachers, who have believed in the false "health
and wealth" gospel which is the dominate
theme of the Pentecostal and Charismatic
movements. Only the biblical Gospel, based solely
in the shed blood of Jesus Christ, which is given
as a free gift by God's grace and received by
faith saves. It is not my intent to be condemning
or rude, but with a loving and caring spirit
present God's truth to people who have been ill-taught
about this matter.
The
Bible plainly teaches that "tongues"
was one of the first century sign gifts directed
toward unbelieving Jews to Jesus Christ who was
the promised Messiah and the Apostles' message of
Christ was genuine. Further, less that forty
years after Christ returned to heaven the sign
gifts ceased because after Jerusalem and the
Temple in Jerusalem were destroyed in 70 AD,
Israel ceased from being a nation, the Jews were
dispersed, the Kingdom postponed because Israel
had rejected Jesus as their Messiah. With Israel
destroyed there was no longer any need or purpose
for the sign gifts and they ceased. During this
transitional period between the resurrection of
Jesus Christ and the destruction of Jerusalem,
most of the New Testament was written which
further cancelled the need of signs as the
churches had God's written word.
There
is surely a need to proclaim God's truth on the
matter because I think all would agree that God
can only bless truth. He cannot, nor will He ever
bless error no matter how well intended or
sincere it may be. If a practice is not biblical
it is not of God and clearly all false teaching
honors the father of lies Satan. Thus it is
important to know what God has said in His Word
and reject all false teachings that distorts and
corrupts truth and misleads people.
There
is no middle-of-the-road approach to the tongues
issue. If tongues is a valid gift in the churches
today then every Bible believing church should
follow the God's Word and accept tongues. However,
if it is not a valid gift for the body of Christ
today, then we should teach the truth and reject
it as being unbiblical.
Unfortunately, many denominations take the middle-of-the-road
approach by refusing to take a stand either way.
They have compromised with both parties trying
not to offend anyone and by not taking a stand
they have in fact condoned the practice. To not
take a stand against false teaching is supporting
error and false teaching.
God did not give us His Word to be confusing.
Many people however take the approach that the
Word of God is confusing on this matter and that
we cannot really know for sure what is right.
This surely expresses a poor opinion of God that
His Word is too confusing to understand. However,
this is not the case. God did not leave the
matter in discord. The problem is not with God's
Word, but with man. God spoke very clearly on the
matter, yet many seem unwilling to listen,
preferring rather to listen to the teaching of
men and denominations.
The modern tongues movement has spread across
this nation and the world like wildfire. For many
years it was confined to the Pentecostal churches,
but now crosses all denomination lines in the
form of what is called the Charismatic Movement.
Even Roman Catholics, Protestants, cults, and
some who call themselves Baptists practice
tongues and have joined the movement.
Some think that tongues is only practiced by
Christian denominations, but it is a phenomena
found also in pagan religions. The Oracle at
Delphi, for instance, which started in the 400s
BC, when Greece was at its strongest records the
pagan practice of using ecstatic speech in the
worship of their false gods. It continued into
the Roman era which would indicate the members of
the churches of Greece and Asia Minor would have
been familiar with how Delphi worked. It was a
shrine of the Greek god Apollo. In response to
someone's questions, a priestess would go into a
frenzy and start a babbling speech. An attendant
priest would then 'translate' the babble into
some glittering generalities that could in some
way be understood as an answer. Some of the best-known
features of Greek philosophy streamed out from
the Oracle's early years (for instance, it bred
the saying "Know Yourself"); the great
Greek philosophers were very good at finding
jewels in waste water. The cult of Dionysis used
rhythmic music, whirling dances, alcohol or
herbal drugs, and magic spells to send peoples'
souls out of their body (Gk ek stasis ) and into
the presence of whatever deity or subdeity was
involved; this too occasionally induced some
strange sounds. African animists, too, have long
practiced ecstatic speech as part of their
religions. But, just as glossolalia among Jews
marked one as a prophet, glossolalia caused most
African animists to project the tongues speaker
into the role of religious leader or priest.
"In the gnostic "gospels" found at
Nag Hammadi, archaeologists discovered what may
be the earliest, and perhaps one of the strangest,
written instances of glossolalia. (Gnosticism
arose at the same time as Christianity, and
Gnostics were skilled at perverting biblical
teachins to the unChristian Gnostic heresies.
They tried to high jack biblical Christianity.
While the contents of the Nag Hammadi documents
are heretical, they give insite into the false
practices of their day. There is a prayer in the
introduction the false "The Gospel Of the
Egyptians. " It reads something like this:
- Ié ieus éó ou éó
óua! O Jesus, bond of Yah's
righteousness, O Living Water, O Child of
Child, O glorious Name! Really truly,
O Eon that is, iiii éééé eeee oo uuuu
óóóó aaaaa, really truly éi aaaa
óó óó! O One That Is, Seer Of the
Ages! Really truly, aee ééé iiii
uuuuuu óóóóóóóó, You who are
eternally eternal, really truly iéa
aió, in the heart, You who Are, You
are what You are, ei o ei eios ei!
Even
the translatable words of this so called prayer
are very confusing and like modern tongues, full
of vowels and mixed languages. Like modern
glossolalia, it's got a lot of almost-words,
divine titles, and 'really truly'. It's almost
like a parody, it's so garbled, but it was
serious in its intent. The ecstatic speech did
not make the book's bizarre beliefs the slightest
bit more true.("Tongues as a Gift, a Sign,
a Practice," Robert H. Longman, Jr.)
The evidence is clear that what was done in
worshiping pagan deities was ecstatic speech not
unlike what the modern tongues movement is doing.
Surely, the Holy Spirit is not in the religious
actions of unbelievers who worship idols and
practice false doctrine.
Many
in defense of the tongues movement refer to its
great success as proof that it is of God. Jesus
in Matthew 24:24, speaking of the rise of false
prophets who would come with great wonders and
signs "if were possible, they shall deceive
the very elect." Although this is a
reference to the beginning of the coming seven
year Tribulation, it teaches clearly that God's
elect, can be deceived by the powerful and
charismatic leaders. (I use the word in its sense
as men with great "charisma" or
personal appeal) The deceivers and false teachers,
of the spirit of the antichrist are in the world
today as stated by John in 1 John 2:18. The truth
of the matter does not rest with its popularity
or outward success, but on "what saith the
Lord!" The Bible, which is God's very word,
is the only authority by which we can know what
is God's truth and what is error.
The
majority of the world is in error today rejecting
the Lord Jesus as their Savior. Jesus warned that,
"Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide
is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth
to destruction, and many there be which go in
thereat: because strait is the gate and narrow is
the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there
be that find it." (Matt. 7:13-14) The
popular trend is to choose the wide road that
leads to destruction. The matter can only be
settled by God's Word!
Many seeing the great numbers, spectacles and
seeming success of the Charismatic movement are
greatly impressed by it. Jesus in Matthew 7:13-29,
warned of false prophets who would come in sheep's
clothing, but would inwardly be raving wolves.
Christ went on to say that at the judgment of the
lost, many would stand before Him and plead that
they had done many wonderful things in Christ's
name and yet Jesus would say to them, they "were
workers of iniquity! (Matt. 7:21-23) This should
make each of us address the matter in a sober and
honest way.
a
One reason the matter is so important is that
many dear souls who are seeking the Lord are
hearing the Gospel mixed with error! Further,
sincere Christians are robbed of their maturity
in Christ and the true blessings of salvation by
being channeled into the emotion based tongues
movement. They are taught to seek emotional
experiences instead of true spiritual growth.
They are taught that worship and communications
with God, to be meaningful it must be accompanied
by physical emotional experiences such as raising
hands in the air, speaking in tongues, and "falling
out in the spirit." Their "worship"
or "praise" is plainly designed towards
the participant experiencing a type of spiritual
"high." The most recent phenomenon is
the so called "laughing revival" where
the participants in the meetings break out in
uncontrollable laughter "under the spirit."
This modern so called worship is basically the
same as practiced in pagan oriental mysticism in
which person's consciousness is elevated towards
some deep spiritual experience. The New Testament
gives no example these any such activities such
as the modern tongues practices. The opposite is
true in that biblical worship is directed towards
God, not the worshiper. The Bible show that
worship is always respectful and orderly.
For the many Charismatics, their prayer life is
one of praying in ecstatic speech without their
understanding. Prayer is thus reduced to an
emotional experience instead of pouring out their
hearts in thanksgiving and presenting their
petitions and supplications to the Lord. Those
"praying in tongues" do not even know
what they are praying. The services of the
tongues movement is completely opposite of what
the Bible teaches concerning worshiping God. They
come to "receive" a blessing from the
service, instead of coming to lift up other
believers and worship the Lord as the Bible
teaches. The "worship" of these
churches is little more than a form of
entertainment with an emotional experience, not
unlike what happens in a musical rock concert.
One example of this came from a Pentecostal
pastor, who was a friend, who often expressed his
frustration over the poor attendance at his
tongues speaking church. His church was small
with limited finances and could not "compete"
with the larger churches in their music programs
and special big name speakers. Even though he had
been misled about what was biblical tongues, I
believed he truly loved the Lord and he did not
emphasize the matter of tongues and miracle
healings. His church in time failed and he
becoming disillusioned and fell by the way side
out of the ministry. The road of the Charismatic
movement is littered with thousands of lives it
has wrecked. When the emotion created by the
Charismatic services runs out they were left
empty inside and castaways on the great sea of
Charismatic confusion. For a while it is great,
but like any emotional experience...it does not
last. As John 4:24 clearly states, those that
worship the Lord must do so in "spirit and
truth." Only living and worshiping in God
truth brings true lasting spiritual peace and joy,
because God only blesses the truth.
Because
of the popularity and seeming success of the
tongues movement, many pastors of a Bible
believing churches are being pressured to take
the ecumenical philosophy. The compromise is
expressed as, "Its OK, we are both
Christians and although we disagree on some
things we can still have spiritual fellowship and
it is not really all that important." This
act of human rationalization is that God's word
condones false teaching and supports error. How
can a man be lead to God's truth by someone who
does not think that truth is important? Truth
that is compromised and mixed with error is not
truth? The true man of God loves the truth and it
is important to him that no one ever hear
anything from him, but the truth. His calling
demands that he only preach God's truth. He does
not want to be guilty of aiding Satan in
supporting a false teaching which is a lie that
honors Satan, the father of lies. Though the
whole world reject the truth, the man of God is
to present only the truth and reject all false
teaching that is contrary to God's word. Many
have been cruelly martyred in past eras for
taking just such an uncompromising stand on God's
Word.
When the biblical errors in the tongues movement
are condemned, many respond to this call for
purity in doctrine with the adage, "Well, at
least some are getting saved." A false
gospel is a lie and does not and cannot save. A
church whose foundational doctrine is based in
error does not have the blessing of God. Almost
very tongues speaking church denies the biblical
doctrine of the eternal security of the believer
(Once saved always saved). Denying the eternal
security of the believer denies the very heart of
the Gospel that a man is saved totally by God's
grace through faith and not of his good works.
The Bible teaches that man cannot save himself
nor keep himself saved by good works (Eph. 2:8-9).
It is a false Gospel that teaches once saved a
child of God can lose their salvation and that
God will reject His own child.
Another mark of the Charismatic movement is its
ecumenical agenda of seeking to bring all "Christians"
together on equal ground without regard to
doctrinal purity. Doctrine and biblical truth
take a back seat to the Charismatics and
Pentecostals behind emotion, experience and
coming together. Unbiblical churches such as the
Roman Catholic church who a practice heresy and a
works system of salvation are treated as equals
with Bible believing New Testament churches who
preach salvation by grace alone through faith.
It
is God Himself, through the Holy Spirit that
convicts men and draws them to salvation. God
will not use error or false teachers to
accomplish His work. God will only use His truth
and it is against His very nature to do otherwise.
A dominate theme of the tongues speakers is
promoting what is termed the "health and
wealth gospel." This unbiblical teacher
promises health and wealth to those who receive
Christ. However, it is conditional of giving
financially to support a church or ministry. It
distorts biblical teaching of giving to a "give
to get" scheme in which a person supposedly
invests "seed money" with God who then
gives materially to the giver. This false gospel
has made multi-millionaires of many Charismatic
and Pentecostal preachers. It is used by most
radio and TV "ministers" who cunningly
deceive their audiences with the "get rich"
or "healing" scheme
A church which takes the middle road or does not
rebuke and reprove these false teadchings is a
compromising church and is not a church that
speaks for God. Even it does not practice tongues
it condones it with its silence. When a church
takes any position contrary to true doctrine it
separates itself from God and begins down a road
that will eventually lead to apostasy. In over a
quarter of a century of ministry I have not know
even one church that took the middle road of
compromise that was doctrinally sound. Accepting
error and false doctrine is sin and sin grows
where it is not quickly addressed, corrected and
confessed. (See the Lord's warnings to the
churches in Asia in Revelation 2-3) A
compromising church loses any clear message of
what is right and what is wrong. It will cease to
have any power to do the work of God, because God
cannot bless error.
Compromising pastors and churches lose biblical
discernment. They become unable to determine
truth from error. The tremendous growth of the
Promise Keepers movement which seeks to do away
with all doctrinal differences and bring "Christianity"
together with no biblical distinctions is the
direct result of this heretical unscriptural
philosophy. The very core of the ideology of the
Promises Keepers is anti-doctrine and thus it is
Anti-christ. It does not matter that they appear
to be serving Christ, their doctrinal error
brands them as Anti-christs, as clearly as Cain's
rebellious offerings branded him as being against
God. Cain was acting were religiously, but was in
fact disobeying God.
Why are so many deceived and unable to discern
the error of the movement? The answer is a simple
one...they have been in training to accept it for
many years by pastors, churches and denominations
who have compromised the Word of God and refused
to speak out against error. Can God bless error?
Will He work where His Word is misused to support
false teachings? Is God a party to confusion. The
answer to these questions is clearly a resounding
and emphatic "No!"
There is a correct translation or meaning of all
Scripture! It is the Devil's device to misuse
even the sacred Word of God to perpetrate his
false doctrines. (Read Matt. 4:1-11) He seeks to
mislead and side track believers. Satan at Christ's
temptation used Scripture to tempt the Lord. He
used it falsely and was corrected by Christ. The
Devil has not changed his ways or methods through
the centuries. This is why the New Testament
preacher, if he is true to his calling, must
absolutely address error often and warn against
it by teaching the truth. By God's grace that is
what this article is attempting to do.
What
Does the Bible Says About Tongues?
The
question that needs answering is this - what does
the Bible say? The problem is not to try to
explain experiences that people have had, but to
determine, "what does God say on the matter."
If God's Word says that tongues is a valid gift
for today then the matter is settled. If it
teaches that tongues ceased after the
establishment of the early church and after the
fall of Judaism then the course is equally clear,
modern tongues is not of God.
Following
is a series of questions answered biblically
which will explain the truth.
I.
Is the practice of the gift of tongues the same
as it was in the New Testament?
- A. The answer is no. What is
practiced as modern tongues is not what
happened on the Day of Pentecost as
described by the New Testament. Absent
today from the modern practice of tongues
is ". . .sound from heaven as of
a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all
the house where they were sitting. And
there appeared unto them cloven tongues
like as of fire, and it sat upon each of
them." (Acts 2:3-4) Further,
each of those present at Pentecost were
filled with the Holy Spirit and began to
speak the Gospel in a language that the
person had not learned. "Now when
this was noised abroad, the multitude
came together, and were confounded,
because that every man heard them speak
in his own language. (Acts 2:6)
Verses 9-11 lists the sixteen languages
which were spoken. It was not ecstatic
speech or used in prayer nor was it
something they were coached to perform.
Further it was not sought or prayed for
but came instantly being given by the
Holy Spirit to all present. Further as
the passage states it was given by the
Holy Spirit for the benefit of those Jews
who were in Jerusalem to celebrate the
Feast of Pentecost and convey to them the
Good News that Jesus Christ was the
Messiah.
These
Jewish pilgrims had come to Jerusalem to
celebrate the Feast of Pentecost, as they
had been done for centuries. Pentecost,
was the Jewish Feast of the Harvest and
fell fifty days after the Passover, which
was the day God delivered Israel from
Egypt. Israel fifty days after leaving
Egypt was at Mt. Sinai and there God gave
them the Ten Commandments and the Law,
and thereby constituted them as a nation.
On the day of Pentecost, as Acts 2
records, fifty days after the Christ was
crucified God began the institution of
the local church and the Church Age began.
God wanted these Jewish Pilgrims to hear
the "wonderful works of God." (Acts
2:11) The Jewish leaders in Jerusalem had
rejected Jesus as the promised Messiah
and had cried for His death before the
Roman governor. Many of these pilgrims,
being only recent visitors to Jerusalem,
did not know about Jesus Christ and what
He had done.
These
Jewish pilgrims were bilingual and surely
could understand Greek and Aramaic.
However, God thought it was necessary for
them to hear the news of Christ's coming
through the miracle of hearing in their
native language by men who were unlearned
in their tongue. The disciples, gathered
in the upper room who were indwelled by
the Holy Spirit could have spoken Greek
or Aramaic and communicated with these
pilgrim Jews. The reason for the miracle
(sign) was God bringing attention to the
prophecy of Joel 2:28f. Tongues was a
miracle, a special sign gift, given to
the Galilean disciples to show the
unbelieving Jews that Jesus whom they had
crucified was indeed the Messiah. Note in
Peter's sermons that is exactly what he
preached. The Jews fully understood that
Joel prophesied of the great destruction
of the judgment of God in Daniel's 70th
Week or the Seven Year Tribulation. In
Joel 2:28, deliverance in the "last
days" is promised and associated
with a great out pouring of the Spirit of
God. Peter made the connection that they
were indeed in the "last days"
and that God had sent Jesus Christ as
their Deliverer and they rejected Him.
God
told the disciples to wait in Jerusalem "for
the promise of the Father, which saith He,
ye have heard of me." (Acts 2:4)Jesus
was referring to what He had earlier told
His disciples about the coming of the
Comforter and that they would receive the
indwelling Holy Spirit. "If ye
love me, keep my commandments. And I will
pray the Father, and he shall give you
another Comforter, that he may abide with
you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth;
whom the world cannot receive, because it
seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but
ye know him; for he dwelleth with you,
and shall be in you" (John 14:15-17).
Note the wording of verse 17. Jesus said
that at the time He spoke to them, which
was before He was crucified, that the
Holy Spirit "dwelleth with
you" He further stated the
Comforter, "Shall (future tense)
be in you." Therefore Jesus was
telling them they would be indwelled in
the future by the Holy Spirit and that is
what happened on the Day of Pentecost.
The
result of their receiving the indwelling
(baptism of the Holy Spirit) was that
they would ". . . receive power,
after the Holy Ghost is come upon you:
and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in
Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in
Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of
the earth" (Acts 2:5,8).
They waited ten days in the upper room
and as promised on the day of Pentecost (Feast
of the First Fruits) God sent the Holy
Spirit who indwelled them and gave them
power to be witnesses that Jesus was
truly the Messiah. (See Acts 1:8)The
message was heard by these visiting
Jewish pilgrims and about three thousand
of them believed and were saved. They
were not under the influence and
domination of the Jewish leaders in
Jerusalem and they heard the Gospel
unhindered by the lies of the priests,
Scribes and Pharisees. Note also that the
Bible says these were "devout men,
out of every nation under heaven."
These were saved, God fearing Jews who
came to Jerusalem to worship God. They
believed in God and when they heard the
Messiah being proclaimed in their nature
tongues by unlearned men, they knew that
this was of God and they accepted Him.
Thus the sign of the gift of speaking the
Gospel in a unlearned language was used
by God to give this wonderful news to
Jews who were looking for the coming
Messiah. Acts 2:41 records that three
thousands of these Jews believed and
received Christ as their Messiah. It was
absolutely not a sign of receiving the
baptism of the Holy Spirit, but a sign to
the Jews that Jesus was the Christ. It is
appalling that some churches have so
distorted this plain truth of God's word
to support the false modern tongues
movement.
Jesus in John 8:19 said to the Pharisees
in the temple in Jerusalem, ". .
. Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if
ye had known me, ye should have known my
Father also." (John 8:19) What a
contrast between these two groups. One
group had witnessed first hand the
miracles and message of Jesus Christ, but
had rebelliously rejected Him as their
Messiah. This other group of Jews, who
came from out of town, already loved God,
and when they heard of Christ believed
and they received the indwelling of the
Holy Spirit of God and became part of the
bride of Christ. They then took the
message back to their native lands.
Clearly, God used the miracle sign gift
of languages (tongues) so that each one
of them heard the Gospel, the death,
burial and resurrection of Christ in
their own language and understood that
Jesus was the promised Messiah. (See 1
Cor. 15:1-4)
Why did God present the Gospel to them in
this way? We can better understand this
if we consider what Paul said about the
Jews in 1 Corinthians 1:22, "For
the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks
seek after wisdom." God has
throughout the history of Israel always
used signs to speak His Word to them. All
those who heard the Gospel on the Day of
Pentecost were Jews or Jewish proselytes.
(Gentiles who converted to Judaism) They
believed because they witnessed the
unmistaken sign miracle of hearing men
who had not learned their language
speaking to them in their native tongue.
They knew the Scriptures and Jesus
fulfilled the Old Testament prophecies
concerning the Messiah's coming. This was
the reason that God used this method to
tell them of the Messiah and the reason
for using the sign gift of tongues. The
mirage of tongues authenticated the
Gospel message that Peter preached. They
knew unmistakenly that it was from God
and three thousand Jews believed and were
saved.
The Bible says that tongues was
accompanied by three supernatural acts:
- (1) The sound of the
mighty rushing wind.
(2) The appearance of cloven
tongues of fire.
(3) The miracle of speaking the
Gospel by Jews in Jerusalem to
foreign Jews their native
language, which the Jerusalem
Jews had not learned.
The first two are conspicuously absent
from what is practiced as tongues today.
The supernatural act of speaking in an
unlearned language can be faked, however
the accompanying sound as of a mighty
rushing wind and the visual appearance of
cloven tongues of fire cannot be easily
counterfeited and are never seen when
modern tongues are practiced. Although it
is claimed that modern languages are
being spoken by those who practice
tongues, it is difficult to verify and
the other two supernatural acts being
absent shows it is not valid. There is no
sign of a mighty rushing wind or cloven
tongues of fire. Clearly, tongues as
described in the Word of God is not what
is happening today. There are only three
examples in Scripture that describes
tongues and they each are identical with
the first occurrence. There is no example
in the Bible of tongues being used as a
prayer language or anything different
than what happen on the Day of Pentecost
and the two other recorded occurrences.
The
second times tongues is mentioned in
Scripture is three years later in Acts 10:44-48.
Cornelius, a Roman Centurion, after
hearing and believing the Gospel as Peter
preached, experienced the same exact
circumstances as did those on the Day of
Pentecost in Acts 2. Peter reported back
to the Jewish believers and said, "Forasmuch
then as God gave them the like gift as he
did unto us, who believed on the Lord
Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could
withstand God?" (Acts 11:17) Peter
says God gave them the "like (literally
the "same") gift as he did unto
us." What happened at Cornelius'
house was the same as on the Day of
Pentecost.
Cornelius
was a Gentile who had been proselytized
to Judaism. He was "A devout man,
and one that feared God with all his
house, which gave much alms to the people,
and prayed to God alway." (Acts 10:2)
God sent an angel to him and told him to,
". . . send men to Joppa, and call
for one Simon, whose surname is Peter:"
(Acts 10:5) The next day God prepared
Peter to preach the Gospel to a Gentile.
The Jews thought of the Gentiles as being
unclean and a very low class of people.
Peter saw in a vision, God lowering down
unclean animals in a great sheet and God
told him to, "Rise, Peter; kill, and
eat." But Peter said, "Not so,
Lord; for I have never eaten any thing
that is common or unclean." (Acts 10:13-14)
God replied, "What God hath cleansed,
that call not thou common." (Acts 10:15)
God thus prepared Peter to preach Christ
to Cornelius. As Peter wondered about his
vision, Cornelius's servants arrived at
his house in Joppa. Peter then returned
the next day with the men to Cornelius'
home to the north in Caesarea. Peter as
recorded in Acts 10:25-43, told him of
the Lord Jesus and Cornelius received
Christ. Acts 10:44, says that all who
heard the word received the Holy Spirit.
Note that "they of the circumcision"
meaning the Jews, were astonished that
these Gentiles had received the gift of
out pouring of the Holy Spirit and they
too did speak in tongues and magnified
God. (Acts 10:45-48) When Peter returned
to Jerusalem he reported to the Jewish
believers there, "Forasmuch then as
God gave them the like gift as he did
unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus
Christ; what was I, that I could
withstand God? When they heard these
things, they held their peace, and
glorified God, saying, Then hath God also
to the Gentiles granted repentance unto
life." (Acts 11:17-18)
What happened to the Gentile Cornelius
and his household, was the exact same
thing that happened on the day of
Pentecost. "And as I began to speak,
the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at
the beginning." (Acts 11:15) Here
again the gift of tongues was a sign to
the Jews back in Jerusalem that the
Gentiles had received Christ the same as
had the Jews in Jerusalem.
One thing is clear, those that received
the gift began to speak the Gospel to
those around them. Acts 10:45, says,
"And they of the circumcision which
believed were astonished, as many as came
with Peter, because that on the Gentiles
also was poured out the gift of the Holy
Ghost." It greatly impressed the
Jews (they of the circumcision) that God
had poured out on these Gentiles the
Spirit in the same way as He had the
Jewish believers. Clearly the gift of
tongues was used of God to present and
authenticate the Gospel message that
Jesus was the Messiah.
The reason for God giving the gift of
tongues is obvious. God wanted the
Christian Jews to know that Jesus was the
Messiah, and the Gospel was for Jew and
Gentile alike.
The third time tongues is
mentioned in Scripture is twenty-two
years later in Acts 19:1-8. These were
the disciples of John the Baptist. They
were not Christians, but saved Old
Testament saints who lived in Ephesus,
who had repented anticipating the coming
of the Messiah and the followed the
message of John the Baptist. Probably
they had heard John preach on a
pilgrimage they had made to Jerusalem.
They, however, had not heard about Jesus
Christ, his life, death and resurrection.
They were unaware of Jesus' coming and
were still looking for the Messiah to
come. Although the sound as a mighty
rushing wind and the cloven tongues of
fire are not mentioned there is no reason
to not believe that they were present.
Often in Scripture you will find a
subsequent event earlier mentioned
referred to without relating to all the
details. Because it relates to a known
phenomena that was commonly understood,
all the details are not given in Acts 19.
It is totally conceivable that since Luke
had already fully described the matter
earlier he only mentions the important
facts. The details he does mention is the
fact they spoke in other languages (tongues)
and prophesied. This testifies as to the
effect of the experience on the men and
those who witnessed it.
Why did these men at Ephesus receive the
gift of tongues? It was a sign to prove
to these Jews in the synagogue, who did
not believe in Christ and who were
ignorant of His death, burial and
resurrection, that Jesus Christ was in
truth the Messiah. This gift of tongues
was received by those who believed and
was a sign to those who witnessed the
event that Messiah had surely come. Note
also that only about twelve men spoke in
tongues and prophesied. Prophesied,
simply means they spoke or gave witness
to the Word of God. It does not mean they
foretold future events.
In this account, some Jews at Ephesus
believed in the Messiah. However, even
after Paul had taught there for three
months in the Jewish synagogue, some Jews
hardened their hearts and spoke evil of
the Gospel. Paul then left the Jewish
synagogue where he had been preaching and
separated the believing disciples from
these unbelieving Jews. They then began
to meet daily at the school of Tyrannus
which was a lecture hall. Paul for two
years discipled these Jews who accepted
Jesus Christ as their Savior. The result
was that ". . . all they which dwelt
in Asia heard the word of the Lord Jesus,
both Jews and Greeks." (Acts 19:10)
They too fulfilled Christ's prediction
that, "Ye shall receive power, after
that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and
ye shall be witnesses unto me both in
Jerusalem , and in all Judea, and in
Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of
the earth.: (Acts 1:8) Again the purpose
of tongues was a sign to unbelievers and
those that received the gift of tongues
used it to witness of Christ. That is not
the modern day use of tongues as will be
discussed later.
In Acts 19, when John the Baptist's
disciples received the gift of tongues
they clearly became Christians. They were
saved Old Testament saints who after
hearing the Gospel, which is the Good
News of the coming of the Messiah Jesus
Christ (1 Cor. 15:1-4), they believed and
were immediately indwelled by the Holy
Spirit and became a part of the body of
Christ. The effect of their receiving the
Baptism of the Holy Spirit was that, as
in the other two accounts (Acts 2, 10),
they became witnesses of the Gospel to
Jews. (Acts 1:8)
These are the only three times an account
of the receiving the gift of tongues is
recorded. There is no reason from
Scripture to believe that the three
events were different. Modern churches
which practice tongues make note that in
Acts 19, the account does not mention the
sound as a mighty rushing wind or the
cloven tongues of fire. They point to
this as support for the absence of these
supernatural acts in the modern practice
of tongues. However, they are forcing a
point that is not stated. They are in
fact admitting the supernatural acts are
absent in modern tongues and are trying
to use this account as an example when
these supernatural acts were not present.
As stated, that is forcing the point.
There is no valid reason, apart from
trying to justify the modern experience,
for believing that in each occasion all
events the happened exactly as in Acts 2.
How Does the Modern Gift of
Tongues Compare to the Examples in the Book of Acts?
- 1.
Missing in the modern practice of tongues is the
supernatural acts of God as the event being
accompanied by the sound as of a mighty rushing
wind which fills the whole house and the
appearance of cloven tongues of fire.
2. The modern gift of tongues is used as a so
called "prayer language." There is only
one verse in the Bible that seems to associate
tongues with prayer. In 1 Corinthians 14:14-15,
Paul says, "For if I pray in a tongue, my
spirit prays, but my understanding is unfruitful.
What is the result then? I will pray with the
spirit, and I will also pray with the
understanding. I will sing with the spirit and
will also sing with understanding. Otherwise, if
you bless with the spirit how will he who
occupies the place of the uninformed
say, `Amen' at your giving of thanks, since he
does not understand what you say? You indeed give
thanks well, but the other is not edified. I
thank my God, I speak with tongues more than you
all, yet in the church I would rather speak five
words with my understanding, that I may teach
others also, than ten thousand words in a tongue."
Paul
goes on to say, "Brethren, do not be
children in understanding: however, in malice
babes, but in understanding be mature."
Clearly Paul is condemning the misuse of tongues
among the Corinthians as a prayer language. His
rebuke is plain and establishes clearly that the
gift of biblical tongues was not a prayer
language. I says he would rather speak five word
with his understanding that ten thousand words in
tongues. Could God be make it any clearer that
tongues is not given as a prayer language.
The Definition of the Word
"Tongues."
- First
we need to define what is a "tongue."
In every reference in the New Testament the word
simply means a language. In old English the word
"tongue" means language. In Acts 2:6,
the Greek word is "dialektos" and mean
a language or "dialect." It is the word
used in Acts 1:19, 2:6 & 8, 21:40, 22:2; 26:14
which record the three times that the "tongues"
is recorded as happening in the New Testament. In
the other passages the Greek word is "glossa"
it refers to the tongue as the organ of speech. (see
Mark 7:33, Rom. 3:13, 14:11, 1 Cor. 14:9, Phil. 2:11,
James 1:26, 3:5-6 & 8, 1 Pet. 3:10, 1 John 3:18,
and Rev. 16:10 ) This word means the supernatural
gift of speaking in an unlearned language. In
every case the word refers to a language, and
there is no New Testament reference to "glossa"
being ecstatic speech.
Paul then states the reason for tongues. "Therefore,
tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe,
but to unbelievers; but prophesying is not for
unbelievers, but for those who believe."
Is tongues a valid prayer language? The answer is
no. At Pentecost it was a sign to unbelieving
Jews, in which they heard the Gospel of Jesus
Christ. In Acts 2:11, it says that those present
testified, ". . . we do hear them speak
in our tongues the wonderful works of God." (Acts
2:11) Paul in 1 Corinthians 14: 14, is correcting
the error of using tongues as prayer language. He
says, in verse 15, that he would pray and sing
both with his understanding, because to do
otherwise is unfruitful. Plainly Paul is
condemning those that had perverted the gift of
tongues by teaching it was a prayer language.
Earlier in verse 2, he concluded that when men
spoke in tongues no one understood but God. He
points out the singing and praying in a language
that no one else knows does not help that person
by teaching those present the truth. This is
always in view in the Biblical and correct use of
tongues. Paul emphatically states that tongues
is not for believers, but a sign for unbelievers
who hear the Gospel truth in their own language. The
whole thesis of Paul addressing "tongues"
in 1 Corinthians is that no one should be
speaking tongues in the presence of others
hearers who could not understand what was being
said. (1 Cor. 14:33-40)
Using
tongues as prayer language clearly violates 1
Corinthians 14:22, and this condemns the modern
tongues movement as false, because it teaches in
error it is special prayer language.
Tongues speakers often falsely use Romans 8:26 as
their proof text for tongues as a prayer language.
But note what the verse really says, "Likewise
the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we
know not what we should pray for as we ought: but
the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with
groanings which cannot be uttered." In
this verse tongues is not mentioned or is
implied. The verse says that the intercession of
the Holy Spirit is NOT audible, but "with
groaning which cannot be uttered." Modern
praying in tongues is verbal and audible, this
verse says that the work of the Holy Spirit in
prayer is something that CANNOT be uttered. Note
that the word "spirit" is not
capitalized in 1 Corinthians 14:14. This is not
praying in the Holy Spirit, but praying in a
person's human spirit. Paul says, "my spirit
prayeth" in other words those that practice
tongues as a prayer language are not doing so
though the Holy Spirit, but by their human spirit.
Using 1 Corinthians 14:14, as an example of
"praying in tongues" is a gross error.
Praying in the spirit, as practiced by the modern
tongues movement is promoted as being something
highly desired, yet God, speaking through the
Apostle Paul condemns it. Today modern tongues is
presented as a special spiritual communication
with God, but the truth is the Bible does not
teach this anywhere! In Verse 9, Paul says that
speaking in tongues as the Corinthians were doing
was "speaking into the air."
1 Corinthians 14, is a lengthy admonishment against
the falsely speaking in tongues. It is clear that
what the Corinthians were practicing was not
Scriptural and Paul is admonishing them to stop.
Paul says in verse 19, "Yet in the church
I had rather speak five words with my
understanding, that by my voice I might teach
others also, than ten thousand words in an
unknown tongue." (1 Corinthians 14:19)
Clearly Paul is saying there is no benefit in a
person saying something they or others who hear
them do not understand. In Verse 6, he says,
"Now, brethren, if I come unto you speaking
with tongues, what shall I profit you, except I
shall speak to you either by revelation, or by
knowledge, or by prophesying, or by doctrine?"
(1 Corinthians 14:6)
A careful reading of Chapter 14, clearly
reveals several things:
1. A person is not to seek the gift of
tongues but rather of prophesy. (preaching and
teaching the Word of God) Verses 1,3,5,6,13,16,19,23.
Paul says in Verse 26, ". . . Let ALL
things be done to edifying." The word
"edify" means to "build up."
So Paul is saying one should seek to be empowered
of God to be a preacher or teacher of God's word,
not to seek to practice a sign gift. The movement
tongues movement produces thousands of "tongues
speakers" but rarely in preachers.
2.
There is no reference in the Bible of a woman
speaking in tongues. In 1 Corinthians 14:34,
women were forbidden to speak in tongues in
public. Today, in tongues speaking churches,
it is practiced mostly by women. Paul says if
they had questions they were to ask their
husbands at home. This is a command. If women
were not to speak in tongues in public, when were
they to practice tongues? The Biblical example is
that tongues was a sign gift which was always
done in public in front of unbelievers. It leaves
no other time for women to use tongues except in
private and then one would ask for what reason
would speak in tongues in private when there are
no unbelievers to hear. In two accounts in
Scripture of tongues being practiced it
specifically states it was men who received the
gift.
On the Day of Pentecost: "And how hear we
every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?
. . . Others mocking said, These men are
full of new wine. (Acts 2:8, 13) In Acts 19:7, it
says, "And all the men were about
twelve." (Acts 19:7) In Acts 10:44, the
Bible says the Holy Ghost fell on all who heard
the word. Women could have been present although
it was not their custom to have women present
when men were meeting. Customs of the day
separated the men and women in all public
meetings and when other men visited the home.
Paul says in verse 37, "If any man think
himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him
acknowledge that the things that I write unto you
are the commandments of the Lord." (1
Corinthians 14:37) Note it says that all these
admonishments against tongues was the commandment
of the Lord! In verse 38, Paul is literally
saying a man who will not respect and accept
these instructions should not have his words
respected in turn. "But if any man be
ignorant, let him be ignorant." (1
Corinthians 14:38)
3. Tongues was a sign to unbelievers, NOT to
believers. Today among the Pentecostal and
Charismatic churches the gift of tongues is
presented as a sign that a believer has received
the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. That is
contrary to what 1 Corinthians 14:21-22 says.
Also, not once in the New Testament is tongues
presented as proof of the indwelling of the Holy
Spirit. In Acts 2 and 19, unbelieving Jews were
present and some believed and were saved. In Acts
10, it was a sign to the unbelieving Jews that
the Gospel was to go to the Gentiles as well as
Jews.
Paul states in Romans 8:9, that all believers are
indwelled by the Holy Spirit. He says that if a
person does not have the indwelling of the Spirit
of God he is not God's child or saved. "Be
ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so
that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any
man have not the Spirit of Christ is none of his."
All believers receive the Baptism of the Holy
Spirit at the moment they are saved. This was not
so in the Old Testament. In the Old Testament,
the Holy Spirit "came upon" the one God
has choose for special service. David is the only
person in the Old Testament that the Bible says
was continually indwelled by the Spirit of God. (1
Samuel 16:13) What happened on the Day of
Pentecost was that the fifty, who waited in the
upper room were the first to receive the
permanent indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Jesus
told them just before He ascended into Heaven,
". . . that they should not depart from
Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father,
which, saith he, ye have heard of me. For John
truly baptized with water; but ye shall be
baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence."
(Acts 1:4-5) Verse 8, explains that after they
received the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, "But
ye shall received power, after that the Holy
Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses
unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and
in Samaria and unto the uttermost part of the
earth." From Pentecost unto the Rapture,
all believers are indwelled by the Spirit of God.
Jesus told His disciple this truth in John 7:27-
29, "In the last day, that great day of
the feast, Jesus stood and cried, saying, If any
man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink. He
that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said,
out of his belly shall flow rivers of living
water. (But this spake he of the Spirit, which
they that believe on him should receive: for the
Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus
was not yet glorified.)"
It
is totally a perversion of God's word to teach
that the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, which is the
indwelling of the Spirit, is some second act of
salvation that must be sought and accompanied by
speaking in an unlearned language.
Ephesians 5:18, instructs believers to "And
be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be
filled with the Spirit." There is only
one indwelling of the Holy Spirit, but there can
be multiple "fillings." A believer can
neglect God's presence by letting sin in his life
and get out of fellowship with the Lord. The
"filling" actually means being
controlled by the Holy Spirit. When we sin and
disobey God the flesh is in control and not God.
However, if we confess our sin and ask God's
forgiveness, we then allow the Holy Spirit to
take over and thus are "filled" with
the Spirit.
4. Paul said that the Corinthians were not to
forbid a person from speaking in tongues. More
will be said about this later on. The reason for
Paul's statement was that tongues was still a
valid gift in 56 AD when this book was written.
It will be shown later that according to 1
Corinthians 13:8-10, the sign gifts would cease
when the Scriptures were complete. This happened
around 70 AD, when Jerusalem was destroyed, the
Jews dispersed all over the earth and the nation
of Israel ended and Judaism ceased to be
practiced. The offer of the Kingdom was
temporarily withdrawn and we live now in the
Church Age when God is working primarily with the
Gentiles.
5. The modern tongues movement actually teaches
people how to speak in tongues. No one in the
Bible had to be trained and taught how to
practice the gift of tongues or any special gift
from God. In each case the gift was received
instantaneously and no one prayed or ask God for
the gift. However, today men are taught to pray
and diligently seek the gift of tongues. Don
Basham, who was in the early forefront of the
Charismatic movement in the 1970's, instructs
those trying to practice tongues He says in his
book, A Handbook on Holy Spirit Baptism,
"If you have been praising God in English,
you may find your speech becoming difficult, your
voice stammering. Yield to this stammering and
the new language will form itself easily. Or you
may experience the beginning of this "unknown
tongue" by having the Holy Spirit insert
strange sounding syllables and words in your mind."
(page 106) He continues and says "You may
even stutter and stammer like a baby at first.
Beginning tongues often sound like baby talk."
(p107) Clearly, when God throughout the Bible did
a miracle or gave a special gift the recipient
did not have to be prompted or taught how to
receive it. Basham warns his readers that they
may think, "That's not it! You're just
making up sounds and syllables." But he
urges them on and says, "Go ahead and speak
and keep on speaking." Clearly, modern
tongues speaking is something someone learns to
do. Again, there is no comparison between today's
"tongues" and the examples in the New
Testament and they are completely different.
In all the Bible's instructions on how to pray,
tongues is never mentioned. If tongues is a
special prayer language between a believer and
God, then why is it not mentioned and emphasized.
When asked by His disciples how to pray Jesus
gave them the model prayer of Matthew 6:9-15. The
model prayer shows the one who is praying is to
do so intelligently and with specific content.
Every prayer recorded in the Bible is show as a
person speaking with his full understanding and
presenting his praise, supplications and requests
before the Lord. I think a good question the
person who "prays" in ecstatic speech
should ask themselves is this: "How do I
know if God answered my prayer when I do not know
what I prayed for?"
6. In 1 Corinthians 14:23, Paul says, "If
therefore the whole church be come together into
one place, and all speak with tongues, and there
come in those that are unlearned, or unbelievers,
will they not say that ye are mad?" Many
times I have been told by unsaved men and women
of their experience of attending a tongues
speaking churches. They report on being greatly
alarmed and "turned off" by all the
emotional antics they saw. This is what Paul is
speaking of here. If an unsaved person comes to
our church, they should hear a clear presentation
of the Gospel. How could God be in something that
actually hinders people from hearing the Gospel?
It is interesting that in America English
speaking people came to a church and all they
heard were people speaking something they could
not understand. Does it make sense that God
would give a gift today of speaking some foreign
language to someone in a church where everyone
speaks the same language! What is the point
of having someone speak in a foreign language to
people who cannot understand. In many churches
today in the west there are Spanish speaking
people. Yet, not once in talking to hundreds of
Charismatics have I ever heard of some English
speaking person, who had never learned a foreign
language, witnessing to Spanish speaking person
in their own native tongue. Paul gives the clear
principle in 1 Corinthians 14:33, that if
anything causes confusion it is not of God. The
Corinthian tongues speakers did not have the gift
of biblical gift of tongues and if they had it
there would have been no need for Paul to
addresses this matter.
1 Corinthians 14:37, says it was imperative that
these admonitions against improper use of tongues
were to be followed. That leaves no grounds for
the unbiblical practices of the modern tongues
movement. These instructions Paul gave were
commandments from God. If those who practice
tongues today would apply these simple
admonishments, the modern tongues would die over
night.
The New Testament
Teaches that Gift of Tongues Would Cease.
There is
no evidence of the continuance of the gift after
the period of the early church, nor later in the
ministries of the apostles. Only Paul in 1
Corinthians mentions tongues. The modern tongues
movement began at turn of the 20th Century as it
was unknown in churches after 70 A.D. In
approximately 400 Lectionaries, which were the
written sermons and teachings of those who
followed in the church after the apostles, there
is no mention of tongues. If it was a being
practiced by the first and second centuries
churches why did not these church "fathers"
mention it? The answer is obvious because this
sign gift had ceased.
In 1 Corinthians 13:8-10, Paul clearly states
that tongues would cease as well as "prophecies"
and "knowledge." "Prophecies"
and "knowledge" are both references to
the supernatural writing of the Scriptures. The
question is why did Paul single out prophesies,
tongues and knowledge as being temporary? It is
unmistakable that he says these things would
cease.
The context of this passage is Paul addressing
the improper use of the sign gifts and explaining
what they truly were. In the middle of the
discourse Paul gives us a contrast or
illustration. He uses love (charity) as an
example of something that will never cease. "Charity
never faileth: but whether there be prophecies,
they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they
shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall
vanish away. " (1 Cor. 13:8) He says
love would not cease, but prophecy, tongues and
knowledge would. Each of these three things deals
with God giving forth His revelation to man, in
other words the writing and completion of God's
word he says would in time stop.
The word "prophecies" is plural and
refers to many prophecies. The word is made up of
two Greek words "pro" meaning "before"
and "phemi" meaning "to
speak." Literally is means to "speak
before." Its primary use was in speaking
"before" people and preaching or
proclaiming the word of God. Its normal meaning
was not "forth telling" or
telling the future before in time, but preaching
the Word of God before people. In the early
churches the Apostles literally spoke the Word of
God that was not yet written. This is what the
passage is referring to. After 95 A.D. when the
canon of Scripture was complete by the writing of
the Book of Revelation this type of prophecy
ended. From that point on the "teacher"
has been used of God to prophesy what God had
recorded in the written Word of God. Therefore
Paul said that in time the giving of revelation
from God, which was the written word of God,
would end.
The word "tongues" refers to the
supernatural gift, as recorded in the Book of
Acts which was a supernatural sign given to the
believing Jews to attest that Jesus Christ was
the Messiah and the message of the Apostles that
proclaimed this truth was accurate. Thus the sign
gift of tongues was related to God giving
revelation in that it was a supernatural gift
that authenticated Jesus as the Messiah and the
message of His disciples as being valid.
Therefore the gift of tongues was died to divine
revelation.
The word "knowledge" is also related to
this supernatural understanding of the Word of
God before it was written. The word used is
"gnosis" and primary is used as
"a seeking to know, an enquiry, or
investigation." It too refers to being able
to know and understand God's revelation and be
able to communicate that knowledge to others.
Jesus spoke of this ministry of the Holy Spirit
in John 16:13-14, "Howbeit when he, the
Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into
all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but
whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak:
and he will shew you things to come. He shall
glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and
shall shew it unto you." Jesus said that
the Holy Spirit would guide the apostles in
knowing the word of God and reveal to them the
things to come.
Therefore
prophecy, tongues and knowledge are singled out
as ending because they are each revelational.
Further the words prophecies and knowledge use
the same verb which is in the future passive
tense. However, the word "tongues" is
in the middle voice which means they would cease
automatically of themselves. (A.T. Robertson,
Word Pictures in the New Testament, New York:Harper
& Row, 1931, p179) It shows that Paul is
using this verse to show the contrast of love
with the temporary gifts. Love is permanent, but
prophecy, tongues and knowledge which were
related to the giving of divine revelation were
only temporary.
In 1 Corinthians 13:9-10 says, "For we
know in part, and we prophesy in part. But when
that which is perfect is come, then that which is
in part shall be done away. When I was a child, I
spake as a child, I understood as a child, I
thought as a child: but when I became a man, I
put away childish things. For now we see through
a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I
know in part; but then shall I know even as also
I am known. "
In other words when the canon of Scripture (that
which is perfect) would be completed there would
no longer be any need of these special gifts that
were related to revelation of the Testament
Scriptures, which were at that time in the
process of being written. Some have concluded
that the verse is a reference to the Second
Coming of the Lord Jesus. However, that is
impossible because in verse 10, the word "perfect,"
is neuter in gender. In the Bible, where there is
a reference to the Lord Jesus, He is always
referred to in the masculine gender. The word
"perfect" is neuter and thus a "thing"
and not a person. The "thing" from the
context is easily understood as a reference to
the Word of God, because that is what "prophecy"
and"knowledge" are related to. If the
word "perfect" was masculine it could
legitimately be referring to Christ, but as a
neuter noun it cannot be a reference to Christ.
The word "perfect" is clearly related
to the afore mentioned prophecy, tongues and
knowledge, therefore it is linked grammatically
with giving divine revelation, not the Second
Coming of Christ. There in nothing in this
discourse that hints that this is about Christ's
Second Coming. What is in view is the giving of
revelation and specifically the verse is saying
when revelation is "perfect" meaning
completed, the process of God's giving revelation
would end.
Paul
then makes his statements even clearer by using
the illustration of being like a child. He says,
in verses 11-12, "When I was a child, I
spake as a child, I understood as a child, I
thought as a child: but when I became a man, I
put away childish things. For now we see through
a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I
know in part; but then shall I know even as also
I am known." The illustration points out
the difference between being partial and being
complete. A child has only partial understanding,
but an adult has full understanding. Paul
continues with another illustration which
contrasts being about to see through a darken
glass and being able to see something face to
face. Paul was explaining to the Corinthians that
at that point in time they had only a partial
revelation of God's word, but in time it would be
completed. He used this instruction to point out
to them how seriously wrong in misunderstanding
the use of tongues. Like the modern tongues
movement these people in about 50 AD were not
practicing biblical tongues.
We
must understand that the gift of tongues was
still to some degree valid because Israel was
still a nation and the offer of the Kingdom was
still valid. God was offering the Jews the
Kingdom and therefore tongues was still a sign
gift to point them to Jesus as the Messiah.
Therefore Paul did speak against the valid gift
of tongues, but against is misuse and corruption.
In God's providence and long suffering, He
continued for the next twenty years to offer the
Kingdom to the Jews, but they rejected God and
His offer and in 70 AD Israel was destroyed and
the offer was withdrawn until the Church Age is
finished. In the future Seven Year Tribulation
the offer will be renewed and Israel restored
with them in the end receiving their Messiah and
promised Kingdom. Paul's discourse in 1
Corinthians 12-14 was effective the abuse of the
sign gifts stopped and therefore at 1 Corinthian
they are not spoken of in the churches again.
In 90-95 AD when John finished the Book of
Revelation the period of the sign gifts ended and
they are not valid today.
Conclusion:
From the above references it is
clearly shown that what is occurring in the
modern tongues movement is not supported by the
New Testament as being what happened the early
church. Further once the New Testament canon was
complete there was no further need of the sign
gifts and they ceased.
It can only be concluded that modern day tongues
is not of God, because it is not supported by the
New Testament. Further, what is occurring seems
to be learned or contrived emotional experiences
prompted by the denominations who teach this
false doctrine.
This is not saying that many of the people
involved in the movement are not saved. This is
not determined by whether a person has with his
heart believed and received Jesus Christ as their
Lord and Savior. Christians can believe a
practice unbiblical things. That is apparent in
that every New Testament Epistle except Philemon
is God dealing with believers who were being
taught some false teaching.
|