| |
|
Can a translation be inspired?
ANSWER: Yes, God has
inspired several.
EXPLANATION: In the
Book of Genesis, chapters 42-45, we have the record of
Joseph's reunion with his brethren. That Joseph spoke
Egyptian instead of Hebrew is evident by Genesis 42:23.
"And they knew not that Joseph
understood them; for he spake unto them by an interpreter."
It is, of course, an accepted fact that no
translation can be "word perfect". Therefore we
know that the Hebrew translation of
Joseph's Egyptian statements as found in the Old
Testament manuscripts cannot be an exact word for word
copy. We are left with quite a dilemma. WHOM
did God inspire? Did He inspire Joseph's Egyptian
statements, the Egyptian interpreter's verbal translation,
or Moses' written translation as found in the Hebrew of
the Old Testament?
If God inspired Joseph, was his "original"
statement marred by his Egyptian interpreter, or by Moses'
translation? Or did God inspire Moses to pen an "inspired
translation" which would fly in the face of many
Fundamentalist's charges of "progressive inspiration?"
This same question arises in Exodus
chapters 4-14 in Moses' contest with Pharaoh. Moses,
though speaking for God to an Egyptian
king in the king's native Egyptian tongue, translates
both his and Pharaoh's statements into
Hebrew when he records the account in writing. Which did
God inspire? The verbal statement made in Egyptian, a
copy of which NO ONE ON EARTH HAS? Or did He inspire
Moses' Hebrew translation?
The problem of inspired translations
refuses to go away.
In Acts 22 Paul speaks to his Jewish
tormentors in the Hebrew language (Acts 21:40, 22:2). The
testimony found in verses 1 through 21 is all given
orally in Hebrew. Yet there is NO manuscript
extant of Acts 22 which records Paul's statement in
Hebrew. Luke wrote it all out in Greek. Which did God
inspire? Paul's verbal statement or Luke's "progressive
inspiration"?
The answer is simple and is found in II
Timothy 3:16.
"All scripture is given by
inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for
reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness."
The word "scripture" by its very
root, "script" is a term for written words.
Therefore, we can rest assured that the various
translations (there are more than the
few I have pointed out) we have in our Bible are the inspired
words of God. If a fundamentalist chooses not to believe
in inspired translations, he will have to do it contrary
to the Bible practice.
|