| |
|
Why Trust King
James?
Backing the KJV 1611 as the Word
of God in English
The Attack on the Bible
PART FIVE
by Terry Watkins and James L. Melton (Edited
by Tom Mack)
We will now give some special
attention to one of the deadliest translations on the
market--the New King James Version, first
published in 1979. It is a deadly version because it's
editors have succeeded in deceiving the body of
Christ on two main points: (1) That it's a King James
Bible (which is a lie), and (2) that it's based on
the Textus Receptus (which is only a partial truth).
The following information should be helpful when
dealing with Christians who have been swindled by the
Laodicean lovers of filthy lucre:
- The text of the NKJV is copyrighted by Thomas
Nelson Publishers, while there is no
copyright today on the text of the KJV. If
your KJV has maps or notes, then it may have
a copyright, but the text itself does not.
- There's nothing "new" about the
NKJV logo. It is a "666" symbol of
the pagan trinity which was used in
the ancient Egyptian mysteries. It was also
used by satanist Aleister Crowley around the
turn of this century. The symbol can be seen
on the New King James Bible, on certain rock
albums (like Led Zepplin's), or you can see
it on the cover of such New Age books as
The Aquarian Conspiracy. (See Riplinger's
tract on the NKJV.)
- It is estimated that the NKJV makes over 100,000
translation changes, which comes to over
eighty changes per page and about three
changes per verse! A great number of
these changes bring the NKJV in line with the
readings of such Alexandrian perversions as
the NIV and the RSV. Where changes are not
made in the text, subtle footnotes often give
credence to the Westcott and Hort Greek Text.
- While passing off as being true to the Textus
Receptus, the NKJV IGNORES the Receptus over
1,200 times.
- In the NKJV, there are 22 omissions of "hell",
23 omissions of "blood", 44
omissions of "repent", 50 omissions
of "heaven", 51 omissions of "God",
and 66 omissions of "Lord". The
terms "devils", "damnation",
"JEHOVAH", and "new testament"
are completely omitted.
- The NKJV demotes the Lord Jesus Christ. In
John 1:3, the KJV says that all things were
made "by" Jesus Christ, but in the
NKJV, all things were just made "through"
Him. The word "Servant" replaces
"Son" in Acts 3:13 and 3:26. "Servant"
replaces "child" in Acts 4:27 and 4:30.
The word "Jesus" is omitted from
Mark 2:15, Hebrews 4:8, and Acts 7:45.
- The NKJV confuses people about salvation. In
Hebrews 10:14 it replaces "are
sanctified" with "are being
sanctified", and it replaces "are
saved" with "are being saved"
in I Corinthians 1:18 and II Corinthians 2:15.
The words "may believe" have been
replaced with "may continue to believe"
in I John 5:13. The old straight and "narrow"
way of Matthew 7:14 has become the "difficult"
way in the NKJV.
- In II Corinthians 10:5 the KJV reads "casting
down imaginations", but the NKJV reads
"casting down arguments". The word
"thought", which occurs later in
the verse, matches "imaginations",
not "arguments". This change
weakens the verse.
- The KJV tells us to reject a "heretick"
after the second admonition in Titus 3:10.
The NKJV tells us to reject a "divisive
man". How nice! Now the Alexandrians
and Ecumenicals have justification for
rejecting anyone they wish to label as "divisive
men".
- According to the NKJV, no one would stoop so
low as to "corrupt" God's word. No,
they just "peddle" it (II Cor. 2:17).
The reading matches the Alexandrian versions.
- Since the NKJV has "changed the truth of
God into a lie", it has also changed
Romans 1:25 to read "exchanged the truth
of God for the lie". This reading
matches the readings of the new perversions,
so how say ye it's a King James Bible?
- The NKJV gives us no command to "study"
God's word in II Timothy 2:15.
- The word "science" is replaced with
"knowledge" in I Timothy 6:20,
although "science" has occurred in
every edition of the KJV since 1611! How
say ye it's a King James Bible?
- The Jews "require" a sign,
according to I Corinthians 1:22 (and
according to Jesus Christ - John 4:48), but
the NKJV says they only "request" a
sign. They didn't "request" one
when signs first appeared in Exodus 4,
and there are numerous places throughout the
Bible where God gives Israel signs when they
haven't requested anything (Exo. 4, Exo. 31:13,
Num. 26:10, I Sam. 2:34, Isa. 7:10-14, Luke 2:12,
etc). They "require" a sign,
because signs are a part of their national
heritage.
- The King James reading in II Corinthians 5:17
says that if any man is in Christ he is a new
"creature", which matches the words
of Christ in Mark 16:15. The cross reference
is destroyed in the NKJV, which uses the word
"creation."
- As a final note, we'd like to point out how
the NKJV is very inconsistent in it's attempt
to update the language of the KJV. The
preface to the NKJV states that previous
"revisions" of the KJV have "sought
to keep abreast of changes in English speech",
and also that they too are taking a "further
step toward this objective". However,
when taking a closer look at the language of
the NKJV, we find that oftentimes they are
stepping BACKWARDS! Please note a few
examples of how well the NKJV has "kept
abreast of the changes in the English
language":
| SCRIPTURE |
KJV |
NKJV |
Ezra 31:4 |
little rivers |
rivulets |
| Psalms 43:1 |
Judge |
Vindicate |
| Psalms 139:43 |
thoughts |
anxieties |
| Isaiah 28:1 |
fat |
verdant |
| Amos 5:21 |
smell |
savor |
| Matthew 26:7 |
box |
flask |
| Luke 8:31 |
the deep |
the abyss |
| John 10:41 |
did |
performed |
| Luke 19:11-27 |
pounds |
minas |
| John 19:9 |
judgement hall |
Praetorium |
| Acts 1:8 |
bowels |
entrails |
| Acts 18:12 |
deputy |
proconsul |
| Acts 21:38 |
uproar |
insurrection |
| Acts 27:30 |
boat |
skiff |
| Hebrews 12:8 |
bastard |
illegitimate |
Another counterfeit "KJV"
is the New Scofield Reference Bible (NSRB). "King
James Version" is clearly printed on the cover,
but since when has it been safe to judge a book by it's
cover? Please note the following:
- Dr. C.I. Scofield had been dead many years
when the NSRB was published in 1967. He would
have never approved of having his name on a
"bible" that alters the text of the
KJV. The 1909 and 1917 editions of the
Scofield Reference Bible do NOT change the
text. Therefore the NSRB of 1967 is NOT a
Scofield Bible and it is NOT a KJV.
- Dr. Scofield would have never referred to
baptism as a "sacrament," but the
NSRB takes the liberty to do so in an Acts 8
footnote.
- The NSRB changes the KJV with "better
readings" in over 6,500 places.
- In the introduction to the NSRB, 1967 edition,
E. Schuyler English tries to justify changing
the KJV text on the basis that Dr.
Scofield saw the need to update his reference
Bible after only eight years. Yes, Dr.
Scofield did update his Bible after only
eight years, but HE NEVER CHANGED THE TEXT!,
and he never granted anyone else permission
to do so. Only the NOTES were revised! (The
Judgment Seat of Christ is going to be very
interesting to say the least!)
- In many places the NSRB agrees with the
readings of the new translations, rather than
the KJV, so it cannot possibly be a KJV. For
example, "a son of the gods"
appears in Daniel 3:25, rather than "the
Son of God" (KJV). In Genesis 1:28, Adam
is told to "fill" the earth,
instead of "replenish" it, which
isn't the same at all. A great reference to
television and magazines is destroyed when
the NSRB replaces "pictures" with
"stone idols" in Numbers 33:52.
Then, of course, the NSRB lines up right
behind the ASV in places like I Timothy 6:20,
Acts 4:27, and Romans 1:25.
- Dr. William Grady addresses the NSRB in his
book, Final Authority. His research
includes the following on page 316: "A
random survey of the NSRB margins in
Philippians alone revealed a total of 29
changes from the King James Bible. Of these,
twenty-one (72%) were traced to either the
RSV or the NASV. The skeptic can ckeck it out
for himself: Philippians 1:7, 8, 23, 27; 2:1,
15, 25, 27, 28; 3:1, 8, 17, 19, 20, 21; 4:3,
6, 14, 15, 21, and 22." The
"New Scofield Reference Bible"
in the "King James Version"
is NOT new, is NOT a Scofield
Bible, and it is certainly NOT a King
James Version.
|